Demographics details for Gresham, OR vs Water valley, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gresham, OR vs Water valley, MS.
| Data | Gresham | Water valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 111,621 | 3,361 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $69,437 | $45,718 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Gresham vs Water valley
- In Gresham, the population is higher at 111,621, compared to 3,361 in Water valley.
- Residents in Gresham have a higher median age of 37.3 years compared to 35.8 years in Water valley.
- Gresham has a higher median income of $69,437 compared to $45,718 in Water valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gresham at 38.0% compared to 27.0% in Water valley.
- Gresham has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Water valley.
- Water valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.9% in Gresham.
Demographics
Demographics Gresham vs Water valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gresham | Water valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 49 |
| White | 55 | 49 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 22 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gresham vs Water valley
- In Water valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 4% in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 49% in Water valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Gresham at 5% compared to 0% in Water valley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gresham at 22% compared to 2% in Water valley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gresham at 13% compared to 0% in Water valley.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gresham at 1% compared to 0% in Water valley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gresham | Water valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 28.4% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.2% | 12.9% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gresham vs Water valley
- More residents in Gresham report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 18.2% in Water valley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gresham at 28.4% compared to 22.0% in Water valley.
- Water valley has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 17.6% in Gresham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 12.9% in Water valley.
- Water valley has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 28.6% in Gresham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gresham at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Water valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gresham | Water valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (1,757) | 1.0% (34) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (16,776) | 24.0% (805) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (18,399) | 13.0% (437) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (18,082) | 9.6% (322) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gresham vs Water valley
- A higher percentage of residents in Gresham have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.0% in Water valley.
- In Water valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.0% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
- More residents in Gresham have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 13.0% in Water valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gresham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 9.6% in Water valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.