Demographics details for Columbia, SC vs Clarendon, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Columbia, SC vs Clarendon, TX.
| Data | Columbia | Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 139,698 | 1,948 |
| Median Age | 28.3 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $54,095 | $47,457 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Columbia vs Clarendon
- In Columbia, the population is higher at 139,698, compared to 1,948 in Clarendon.
- The median age in Clarendon is higher at 33.7 years, compared to 28.3 years in Columbia.
- Columbia has a higher median income of $54,095 compared to $47,457 in Clarendon.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Columbia and Clarendon at 25.0%.
- Columbia has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 10% in Clarendon.
- The unemployment rate in Columbia is higher at 5.8%, compared to 3.5% in Clarendon.
Demographics
Demographics Columbia vs Clarendon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Columbia | Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 40 | 11 |
| White | 48 | 76 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Columbia vs Clarendon
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Columbia at 40% compared to 11% in Clarendon.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clarendon at 76% compared to 48% in Columbia.
- In Clarendon, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Columbia.
- Clarendon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Columbia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Columbia at 5% compared to 3% in Clarendon.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Columbia and Clarendon at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Columbia | Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 25.8% |
| Smoking | 19.1% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 39.0% | 38.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Columbia vs Clarendon
- In Clarendon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.6% in Columbia.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarendon at 25.8% versus 20.8% in Columbia.
- Clarendon has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 19.1% in Columbia.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clarendon at 18.3% compared to 18.1% in Columbia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Columbia at 39.0% compared to 38.4% in Clarendon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Columbia at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Clarendon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Columbia | Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (555) | 0.7% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 8.4% (11,712) | 11.4% (222) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (8,257) | 17.6% (342) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (34,575) | 7.3% (142) |
Education Levels Comparison: Columbia vs Clarendon
- In Clarendon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Columbia.
- In Clarendon, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.4% compared to 8.4% in Columbia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarendon at 17.6%, compared to 5.9% in Columbia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 7.3% in Clarendon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.