Demographics details for Chicago, IL vs Los angeles, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chicago, IL vs Los angeles, CA.
| Data | Chicago | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,665,039 | 3,822,238 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $71,673 | $76,244 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.1 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Chicago vs Los angeles
- The population in Los angeles is higher at 3,822,238, compared to 2,665,039 in Chicago.
- The median age in Los angeles is higher at 36.5 years, compared to 35.3 years in Chicago.
- Los angeles has a higher median income of $76,244, compared to $71,673 in Chicago.
- In Los angeles, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 30.0% in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 17% in Los angeles.
- The unemployment rate in Chicago is higher at 7.1%, compared to 6.0% in Los angeles.
Demographics
Demographics Chicago vs Los angeles provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chicago | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 9 |
| White | 23 | 16 |
| Asian | 7 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 49 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chicago vs Los angeles
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chicago at 29% compared to 9% in Los angeles.
- Chicago has a higher percentage of White residents at 23% compared to 16% in Los angeles.
- In Los angeles, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 7% in Chicago.
- Los angeles has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 30% in Chicago.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Los angeles at 13%, compared to 10% in Chicago.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chicago and Los angeles at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chicago | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 16.3% | 16.1% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chicago vs Los angeles
- In Los angeles, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 14.5% in Chicago.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chicago at 16.3% compared to 16.1% in Los angeles.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chicago at 15.1% compared to 11.8% in Los angeles.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chicago at 16.5% compared to 14.9% in Los angeles.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chicago at 34.1% compared to 29.5% in Los angeles.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chicago at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Los angeles.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chicago | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (44,697) | 3.0% (116,335) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (354,780) | 12.1% (461,986) |
| Less than High School | 15.8% (419,784) | 28.8% (1,101,987) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.4% (811,024) | 26.2% (1,002,780) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chicago vs Los angeles
- In Los angeles, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.7% in Chicago.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago hold a high school diploma at 13.3% compared to 12.1% in Los angeles.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Los angeles at 28.8%, compared to 15.8% in Chicago.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chicago hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 26.2% in Los angeles.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.